Evidence of Ignorance and Innocence in the BISP

There is lots of evidence of ignorance and innocence in The Boy In Striped Pyjamas for example Bruno remains ignorant to the end of what goes on inside the camp and he remains innocent when he is with Shmuel this all related to to the innocence and ignorance of Bruno.

The evidence given in the book on innocence and ignorance plays a major role as it is all the way through the book and even the movie but in the movie some bit have been modified to make the book look less horrific and make the movie atrocious and this will certainly have an effect on the readers and the viewers who are either reading or watching the book.

Bruno betrays Shmuel

The BISP has many themes in it for examle one of them is the betrayal of Shmuel by Bruno. Bruno refuses to acknowledge the friendship between them. This demonstrates a good example of the holocaust between the Germans and the Jews.

Differences between book and movie of BISP

In the movie its not the same as the book, the movie is more dramatic than the book, as the book has more of an ending that finishes so sudden where as the movie the ending blends into the death of Bruno and Shumel 

In the book Bruno mentions Out-with an the fury but in the movie he does’nt we don’t know why he doesn’t mention it but its probably the directors view of the book.

How does Boyne use language to establish Bruno’s naivety?

Boyne uses childish language to establish Brono’s naivety this demonstrates that Bruno does not understand what is happening and you are thinking what a stupid boy he is but he is just only aboy so does not fully understand the concepts of nature.